The truth about ocean plastic: Why straw bans are not the earth-saving milestone you might think - pet film for food packaging
The Western world is now using plastic straws for a bit of time.
To protect the ocean from marine litter, Vancouver is currently Canada's first city to plan to ban marine litter.
In recent weeks, A & W Hotels, Marriott Hotels and Starbucks in Canada have all announced similar bans.
But if we wake up tomorrow and find a straw
In this free world, the global crisis of marine plastics will hardly change.
Here's why the world's sudden focus on the straw ban could end up making everything worse.
Let's start talking about this now: no one rationally thinks that marine plastic is not a devastating, deteriorating problem.
The big garbage patch in the Pacific is expanding rapidly.
Marine plastic usually smells like seabirds food, which is why it is as high as all seabirds species.
On April, a whale was washed up on the Australian coast and died of nearly 30 kilograms of plastic piled up in her stomach.
The marks of plastic began to increase.
Last year, a study by the Helmholtz mhoz environmental research center in Germany showed that as many marine plastics in the world came from 10 rivers: 8 in Asia and 2 in Africa.
In the same year, a report from the Marine Protection organization concluded that there were only five countries in China, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam.
Meanwhile, the Helmholtz mhoz report states that there are some of the lowest levels of floating plastic in the Great Lakes Basin
A region that includes Cleveland, Chicago and more than 9 million Canadians.
Take-out here is waste management: all those blue bins and trash cans in Toronto do relatively well in preventing straws from entering the turtle's nose.
This also means that the serious choice of Western consumers on the global issue of marine litter is a rounding error.
Over the past 30 years, the rapid growth of Asia's economy has led to a wave of consumer waste, completely flooding the local containment system.
This is a rare view of North America with beaches all over Eastern Asianor are .
In the journal Science, countries ranked at the rate of "poorly managed" waste.
Large marine pollution countries such as Bangladesh are not good at managing up to high levels of garbage.
In the United States, this ratio is only 2%.
Considering that the average American population produces five times more garbage than the Bangladeshi population, this figure is even more striking.
Kristen Cole, a waste researcher at Nottingham Trent University, wrote that if humans really want to reduce plastic pollution, "even the smallest intervention in poor countries can have a huge impact, the benefits per dollar will be much greater
"Almost every article on the straw ban mentions that, near Costa Ricca, a turtle painfully removed a portion of the plastic straw from his nose.
There are now more than 33 million views, and the video includes specific calls for the global elimination of a single videouse straws.
While this particular turtle will certainly agree, the straw is not necessarily the only dangerous category in plastic.
Under the lobbying of the marine conservation organization, a panel of ecological experts discussed which kind of plastic waste is most dangerous to marine life.
They have straws on their list, but plastic bags, buoys, cigarette butts, balloons, fishing equipment, utensils, and even other types of food packaging are more than straws.
Specifically, straws and mixers are only listed as 11 of the most dangerous garbage categories for turtles.
The main reason to separate the straw from the top killer is that while it can cause damage once it's taken in, it can't entangle the creature --
It is easy to become the most deadly consequence of marine garbage.
Meanwhile, compare the experience of Costa turtles with the fate of another sick turtle
Fate reptiles: a Endangered Kemp Ridley turtle found on a beach in Alabama this week was strangled by a beach chair.
Local conservation groups say the tragedy is not a specific charge against beach chairs.
Virus video when it comes to complex ecological issues.
None of the environmental activists claimed that the use of straws was a panacea for purifying the ocean.
According to the global wildlife protection organization, Straw should be a "";
The humble beginning of the years-
Ban long term sports for other singlesuse plastics.
Marine biologist Christine fegenner, who filmed the turtle video, picked out the straws because they were particularly "useless" and therefore easily removed from the waste stream.
In projects, straws are often counted.
But because of their relatively light weight, they may account for only a fraction of the total amount of marine waste each year.
When it comes to pure ocean slaughter, the impact of the straw is completely insignificant compared to products that have not received almost as much news coverage.
Earlier this year, a paper in the journal Science report pointed out that 46 of the plastic that formed the Pacific garbage belt was made up of discarded fishing gear or "ghost fishing gear.
Given that fishing gear is specifically used to kill marine life, it is also the deadliest.
"Fishing Gear clearly poses the biggest ecological threat compared to other consumer goods discarded in the ocean," the above 2015 Marine Protection report warned.
More importantly, there are many shovels.
Preparation and repair of ghost gear including repurchase plan, digital traceability and fast food restaurant.
(Oh, look: This is a registered charity that specializes in a campaign ). An oft-
It is repeated that the United States uses 0. 5 billion straws a year. Here it is .
Here, it is referenced back. straw group .
It is used here in literary works.
A city where Canadians use 57 million straws a year-
They infer this figure purely by adjusting the 0. 5 billion figure of the Canadian population.
But in January, rational found the 0. 5 billion figures, which came from an unscientific survey of nine people. year-old.
Specifically, it comes from the-
Straw activist Milo Cress told the reason that he came up with the figure when he was a child by telephone to investigate straw manufacturers.
A more reliable number could be 0. 175 billion.
The straw is still bad, of course, it is still a high quantity, but the inference may be-
The straw movement did not count the real downstream impact of the municipal and corporate straw bans.
At the same time, just this week, the New York Times said, "more than 0. 5 billion disposable plastic straws are used every day.
"This is not unprecedented for well --
This means that the environment will backfire. Anti-
The Without check of late of throw garbage movement
The explosion of the 20 th century
Use consumer goods.
It has been concluded that the ban on plastic bags has led to alternatives to more resources
Intensive life cycle.
As for Starbucks, the coffee giant gave an estimate.
While the cups are recyclable on the surface, their plastic lining ensures that they are littered with garbage without state-of-the-art recycling facilities.
The Starbucks cup was thrown in on 2015.
Store recycling bins in Toronto and make sure they are being quietly replaced with trash cans.
Starbucks has also made environmental commitments that have never been realized.
In 2010, the company promised that all its coffee would be poured into reusable or recyclable cups by 2015.
Most importantly, Starbucks's straw ban will actually put more plastic into the waste stream.
The coffee giant is replacing the straw with a special "suction cup --
Style covers also made of disposable plastic.
Analysis of the covers () determined that they actually contained a little more plastic than the previous onesand-
All in all, the main creators of American garbage are taking a measure that will eventually make more garbage and for that they are considered "authors.
One does not need to be a complete nothingness, toas "put a band aid on a huge wound and pat himself on the back.